The Economic Fallacy of Improving Air Quality in Europe: the Social and Economic Costs of Inaction Are Far Greater than Taking Ambitious Action

[This document is a one of a series of discussion notes addressing fundamental questions about the global health. Its purpose is to transfer scientific knowledge to the public conversation and decision-making process. The papers are based on the best information available and may be updated as new information comes to light.]

The economic costs of unhealthy air are greater than the costs of taking action to improve air quality. Delays in implementing stricter air quality directives will lead to greater economic and health costs for EU member states.

ISGlobal's new policy brief, written by Claudia García-Vaz, Alberto Rocamora, Carolyn Daher and Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, provides an insight into the economics of inaction and next steps for ambitious action.

CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE FULL DOCUMENT (592 KB)